Insights into Writing External Device Drivers in Embedded Development: An Analysis of Three Key Points


One major advantage of using microcontrollers today is that embedded software developers no longer typically need to write their own device drivers. It’s common for microcontroller vendors to provide software frameworks that abstract the hardware and enable developers to initialize, read from, and write to peripheral devices—such as SPI, UART, analog-to-digital converters, and more—with simple function calls. However, embedded developers still often need to write drivers themselves to interface with external integrated circuits, which could include sensors, actuators, motor controllers, and the like. In today’s article, we’ll explore several best practices for writing your own drivers for external devices.

Best Practice #1—Separate Implementation from Configuration

A key aspect of writing any driver is to separate the implementation from the configuration. This separation helps ensure that the driver is reusable and flexible. For example, the driver can be easily compiled into an object file, so developers won't have access to its internal details—and thus, it can be used across multiple projects. Developers can still access the configuration module, which they can use to tailor the driver to meet their specific application requirements. If the configuration needs to be adjusted, it won't affect the driver's design or force other projects that rely on the driver to fall out of sync or be compelled to adopt new changes and undergo a validation cycle.

Separating implementation from configuration also allows for abstraction of external hardware, so developers don't need to have a full understanding of what's happening inside the hardware—as is the case with microcontrollers. I often wish that integrated circuit vendors would stop providing configuration tool GUIs and instead devote their efforts to writing reusable and portable drivers for their devices. It’s extremely challenging for each of their customers to write drivers and fully comprehend their modules simply by reading data sheets that are roughly 100 pages long.

Best Practice #2—Create a Simple Underlying Interface

When writing drivers, embedded developers often try to do too much in their implementations, resulting in drivers that become a hybrid of driver and application code. A driver’s interface should feature a simple interface that includes:

An initialization function

Write a function

Read function

Anything beyond that is truly starting to enter the realm of applications! The logic behind this is simple: the driver should simply provide the ability to communicate with the device and enable read and write operations. Then, application modules will access these read and write functions to build reusable application components needed for higher-level application code.

Best Practice #3—Provide Error Detection

Unfortunately, much of the code written by embedded developers simply assumes that everything will work out fine. When writing drivers for external devices, however, we can’t afford to be so complacent. Device drivers must account for potential errors and failures. For example, can the driver time out and report an error? If a read operation is performed, can the function indicate whether the read was successful? And what happens if a parity error occurs?

There are several different approaches to providing error and fault detection in drivers. First, each function can return an error code. If the operation succeeds, this error code will simply evaluate to true; if a problem occurs, the error code will simply evaluate to false. Second, if a problem does indeed occur, an additional feature allowing error checking can be added to the device interface, which would include the following additional operations:

Return drive error status

Clear the driver error status

Similarly, this provides the driver with flexibility and fault-detection capabilities, and allows application code to carefully monitor whether the driver’s operations are successful.

Writing device drivers for integrated circuits beyond microcontrollers represents one of the last frontiers for embedded developers, and we still have to write our own drivers. In today’s post, we’ll explore several best practices for developing drivers for external integrated circuits—practices that will help readers create scalable and reusable drivers capable of detecting faults and enabling application code to respond appropriately.

Related News


How wide should the process margin be? How should the positioning holes be drilled? Have you got these PCB panel‑design details right?

The process‑edge, alignment holes, and the laser‑etched coding area for in‑vehicle two‑dimensional code traceability on PCB panelization are the fundamental reference points that underpin automated mass production and quality traceability in electronic products. Though they appear to be basic structural elements, they directly determine yield rates, batch-to-batch consistency, and the full‑lifecycle traceability of automotive‑grade components.


Display Interface Technology Explained: Core Differences Between MIPI DSI and LVDS, and a Guide to Application Selection

LVDS interface: Mature technology, low cost, and strong anti-interference performance, making it well-suited for industrial displays, conventional automotive applications, and medium-to-large‑size LCD panels where cost sensitivity is high, resolution requirements are moderate (e.g., 1080p or lower), and complex control commands are not needed. MIPI DSI interface: Offers extremely high bandwidth, very low power consumption, supports high resolutions (2K/4K) and high refresh rates, and provides robust control‑command interaction capabilities. It is ideal for smartphones, high‑end tablets, AR/VR devices, and next‑generation smart terminals with stringent requirements for thinness and low power consumption.


Future Market Analysis Report on Embedded Development

By 2025, China’s embedded market has surpassed RMB 1 trillion in size and is undergoing a paradigm shift—from being a “functional platform” to an “intelligent hub.” Leveraging more than a decade of deep expertise in embedded hardware platforms, particularly its extensive ecosystem integration around Rockchip’s AIoT chips, Shenzhen LeaKin Technology Co., Ltd. has successfully established a leading position in key smart edge segments such as industrial control, AI robotics, and edge computing. Seizing the “golden era” driven by technology democratization, rigid demand, and ecosystem maturation, the company is poised to capitalize on two historic opportunities: first, the market restructuring brought about by domestic substitution; and second, the emergence of entirely new application scenarios enabled by the deep integration of AI and embedded systems. By executing a core strategy centered on “deepening vertical applications, leveraging dual domestic AI engines, and co-building an ecosystem brand,” LeaKin Technology aims to evolve from a premier embedded hardware provider into a critical solutions and ecosystem enabler for the intelligent edge era. The company seeks to secure a leading position in the mid-to-long-tail market segment, which accounts for 55% of the overall market, thereby achieving leapfrog growth.


Analysis, Summary, and Strategic Response Report on the Industry Price-Hike Wave

The wave of price increases is both a biting cold wind and a crucible that tests true strength, weeding out the weak and allowing the strong to prevail. Leveraging 13 years of accumulated expertise as our foundation, guided by a steadfast strategy, and propelled by the conviction of growing together with our customers, LeaKin Technology will proactively rise to the challenge and turn adversity into opportunity. We firmly believe that, through comprehensive value enhancement—both internally and externally—LeaKin Technology, in close partnership with our clients, will not only navigate this cycle safely but, once the tide recedes, emerge even stronger to jointly shape the new market landscape!